The Manifesto

Where to discuss the site and forums' principles

The Manifesto

Postby Christian » Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:32 pm

This website has as its aim to promote an analytical and systematic discussion of fashion, conceived as an essentially plural object, at the articulation of a multiplicity of discourses: history of fashion, history of the body and its representations, sociology, anthropology, history of art, aesthetics, etc.

Furthermore we posit that we are dressed by words as much as by garments and that, unless it is insignificant, this activity cannot be devoid of meaning.

At last we wish to transcend the opposition between superficiality and profundity to affirm, along with Paul Valéry, that the most profound thing mankind posseses is its skin, what clothes and adorns him.


Designers that catch our attention refuse the standardisation of clothing design and build, over the course of their collections, a singular voice and identity that makes away with fashion defined as perpetual renewal and seduction of the ephemeral.

They refuse industrial standardization because they affirm the essentially hand-crafted dimension of a garment, which conserves the memory of its origin and inscribes itself in the history of its production and usage.
They refuse aesthetic standardization because they play with the formal codes of classical proportions and rules of symmetry, to naturalize the garment and return its rights to anatomy or, on the contrary, to uproot it from its mundane functionality and invent a new body.


They refuse gender standardization because they challenge its codes of identification and reject the dogmas of garment sexuation: men are no more condemned to aggressive virility than women to ostentatious seduction.
Therefore these designers envision the garment less as a merchandise than an object which maintains with the work of art a dialectical relationship of fascination/repulsion and that is subjected, acknowledges or even showcases the later’s influence. Their undertaking is not to capture trends but to progress on a path.


It is precisely these paths that we wish to explore and discuss here.
User avatar
Christian
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1019
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:01 pm

Re: The Manifesto

Postby c'estdomage » Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:09 pm

Christian wrote:This website has as its aim to promote an analytical and systematic discussion of fashion, conceived as an essentially plural object, at the articulation of a multiplicity of discourses: history of fashion, history of the body and its representations, sociology, anthropology, history of art, aesthetics, etc.

Furthermore we posit that we are dressed by words as much as by garments and that, unless it is insignificant, this activity cannot be devoid of meaning.

At last we wish to transcend the opposition between superficiality and profundity to affirm, along with Paul Valéry, that the most profound thing mankind posseses is its skin, what clothes and adorns him.


Designers that catch our attention refuse the standardisation of clothing design and build, over the course of their collections, a singular voice and identity that makes away with fashion defined as perpetual renewal and seduction of the ephemeral.

They refuse industrial standardization because they affirm the essentially hand-crafted dimension of a garment, which conserves the memory of its origin and inscribes itself in the history of its production and usage.
They refuse aesthetic standardization because they play with the formal codes of classical proportions and rules of symmetry, to naturalize the garment and return its rights to anatomy or, on the contrary, to uproot it from its mundane functionality and invent a new body.


They refuse gender standardization because they challenge its codes of identification and reject the dogmas of garment sexuation: men are no more condemned to aggressive virility than women to ostentatious seduction.
Therefore these designers envision the garment less as a merchandise than an object which maintains with the work of art a dialectical relationship of fascination/repulsion and that is subjected, acknowledges or even showcases the later’s influence. Their undertaking is not to capture trends but to progress on a path.


It is precisely these paths that we wish to explore and discuss here.



A long-winded monologue to excuse your narcissism and informal commercial relations, with French intellectual sheen sans depth. Please try to rewrite the manifesto (less is more) to create a forum devoid of spruiking one or another designer's wears, but apply the critique as you suggest - so far the critical analysis is really absent from what has appeared. Again we are bored by the deification of chosen suspects.
c'estdomage
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:38 am

Re: The Manifesto

Postby Christian » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:51 pm

You didn't read the Manifesto : the words "critical analysis" don't appear there.

About spruiking : why should we loose our time with people we wouldn't like the work of ? People like you do it so much better.
User avatar
Christian
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1019
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:01 pm


Return to Principles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron